Skip to main content
Content Starts Here GSA Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) Database Skip to main content

Committee Detail

Hide Section - GENERAL INFORMATION

GENERAL INFORMATION

Committee NameHydrographic Services Review PanelAgency NameDepartment of Commerce
Fiscal Year2018Committee Number16608
Original Establishment Date12/19/2002Committee StatusChartered
Actual Termination Date Committee URLhttps://www.nauticalcharts.noaa.gov/hsrp/hsrp.htm
New Committee This FYNoPresidential Appointments*No
Terminated This FYNoMax Number of Members*19
Current Charter Date8/31/2017Designated Fed Officer Position Title*Director, Office of Coast Survey
Date Of Renewal Charter8/31/2019Designated Federal Officer PrefixRDML
Projected Termination Date Designated Federal Officer First Name*Shep
Exempt From Renewal*NoDesignated Federal Officer Middle Name
Specific Termination AuthorityDesignated Federal Officer Last Name*Smith
Establishment Authority*Statutory (Congress Created)Designated Federal Officer Suffix
Specific Establishment Authority*P.L. 107-372, Section 105Designated Federal Officer Phone*(240) 533-0104
Effective Date Of Authority*12/19/2002Designated Federal Officer Fax*301-713-4019
Committee Type*ContinuingDesignated Federal Officer Email*shep.smith@noaa.gov
Presidential*No
Committee Function*Other Committee
Hide Section - RECOMMENDATION/JUSTIFICATIONS

RECOMMENDATION/JUSTIFICATIONS

Agency Recommendation*Continue
Legislation to Terminate RequiredNot Applicable
Legislation StatusNot Applicable
How does cmte accomplish its purpose?*The HSRP was established and directed by P.L. 107-372 to provide advice to the NOAA Administrator on matters and responsibilities set forth in Section 303 of the Hydrographic Services Improvement Act (HSIA) of 1998 and its amendments of 2002 and 2008, and on other appropriate matters as the NOAA Administrator refers to the Panel for review and advice. The Panel is a Federal Advisory Committee that advises the NOAA Administrator on carrying out NOAA's navigation services mission, which is to ensure safe, efficient, and environmentally sound movement of commerce along America's marine transportation system. This advice is provided to the NOAA Administrator through reports, issue papers, and formal Recommendation Letters.
How is membership balanced?*The voting members of the panel are individuals who, by reason of knowledge, experience, or training are especially qualified in one or more of the disciplines and fields relating to hydrographic surveying: tides, currents, geodetic and geospatial measurement, marine transportation, port administration, vessel pilotage, and coastal or fishery management, and other disciplines as determined appropriate by the NOAA Administrator. Number of Members: 19. The HSRP Charter states, "The Panel shall consist of fifteen voting members appointed by the Administrator in accordance with the provisions and prohibitions of Section 105 of the Act. Members will be selected on a clear, standardized basis, in accordance with applicable Department of Commerce guidance. The Co-Directors of the Joint Hydrographic Center and two other employees of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration shall serve as non-voting members of the Panel."
How frequent & relevant are cmte mtgs?*The HSRP has at least 2 public meetings a year as proscribed by Public Law 107-372 which states, "The panel shall meet on a biannual basis and, at any other time, at the call of the Chairman or upon the request of a majority of the voting members or of the Secretary." The HSRP reviews current issues and topics of interest requested by the members and NOAA.
Why advice can't be obtained elsewhere?*The HSRP is essential to carry out the responsibilities established under the Hydrographic Services Improvement Act of 1998 and its Amendments of 2002 and 2008. The navigation and hydrographic surveying expertise of the HSRP is not performed by any other Department, Federal agency, or other existing committees.
Why close or partially close meetings?N/A
Recommendation Remarks
Hide Section - PERFORMANCE MEASURES

PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Outcome Improvement To Health Or Safety*YesAction Reorganize Priorities*No
Outcome Trust In GovernmentNoAction Reallocate ResourcesNo
Outcome Major Policy ChangesNoAction Issued New RegulationsNo
Outcome Advance In Scientific ResearchNoAction Proposed LegislationYes
Outcome Effective Grant MakingNoAction Approved Grants Or Other PaymentsNo
Outcome Improved Service DeliveryYesAction OtherNo
Outcome Increased Customer SatisfactionYesAction CommentThe advice and recommendations from the Panel have helped and provided a catalyst to reinforce partnerships, rethink strategic plans, and drafted reauthorization language in the Hydrographic Services Improvement Act, advanced the NOAA Fleet Recapitalization Study, included maritime interests in the Integrated Ocean Observing System program and the Committee for Marine Transportation, and input by NOAA management into NOAA's strategic planning process. Further, advice and recommendations from the Panel also has helped NOAA seek potential collaborative efforts with other Federal partners in the maritime community and deeper understanding of customer and partner requirements.
Outcome Implement Laws/Reg RequirementsNoGrants Review*No
Outcome OtherYesNumber Of Grants Reviewed0
Outcome CommentThe HSRP provides advice and recommendations to the NOAA Administrator on many mission-related programs. Some of the programs that benefit from HSRP input include Nautical Charting, Hydrographic Services, Water Levels and Currents, Physical Oceanographic Real-Time Systems PORTS®, the National Water Level Observation Network (NWLON), Height Modernization, U.S. Shoreline Definitions, Continuously Operating Reference Stations (CORS), Response and Restoration, and Wetlands Restoration. HSRP input ultimately affects the U.S. Marine Transportation System (MTS) and the Nation by providing advice which improves the protection of life and property, efficient and environmentally sound marine transportation, emergency response capabilities, and coastal zone management. Every U.S. citizen relies on the MTS for energy delivery, exports, transportation, cost-effective consumer goods, recreation, and environmental protection.Number Of Grants Recommended0
Cost Savings*More Than $10,000,001Dollar Value Of Grants Recommended$0.00
Cost Savings CommentThere are many examples of anecdotal and indirect cost savings from the HSRP recommendations, especially from a navigation services, safety, security and economic perspective. The HSRP has encouraged partnerships, data sharing, and technological advancement with a variety of private sector, university, and other partners. Direct cost savings figures are not available. Indirect cost savings would total in the millions of dollars. HSRP recommendations, if realized within the multi-agency Committee for Marine Transportation Services (CMTS), offer appreciable savings through aggressively mapping the Nation’s shorelines and navigationally significant waters; integrating coastal mapping efforts and ensuring federally maintained channels, approaches, and anchorages are surveyed to the highest standard (“the Athos I incident alone cost the ship owner and his insurer over $165 million... the true value of wildlife lost and port commerce delayed or deferred cannot be calculated…”); modernizing heights and implementing real-time water level and current observing systems in all major commercial ports ($6.8 - $9.0 million savings per year in Tampa Bay and $14.8 - $18.3 million savings per year (Estimated Annual Benefits of PORTS®)); strengthening NOAA’s navigation services emergency response and recovery capabilities (“According to an economic analysis released by the Port, the nine-day closure [during Hurricane Katrina and other 2005 storms] resulted in increases of energy costs to U.S. consumers exceeding $1 billion); and, disseminating NOAA’s hydrographic services data and products to achieve greatest public benefit (“collisions account for 80% of all reportable recreational boating accidents, and 78% of non-reportable accidents, totaling an estimated insurance loss of over $450 million a year from nearly 100,000 claims. A major cause of claims is “striking a submerged object and groundings...”.”).Grants Review CommentNA
Number Of Recommendations*255Access Contact Designated Fed. Officer*Yes
Number Of Recommendations CommentThe type of recommendation varies. For example, some are written as letters to the NOAA Administrator, or within letters making recommendations for policy changes. Others are verbatim or modified versions of recommendations from reports written by the HSRP's Working Groups and which the entire HSRP discusses and provides consensus recommendations. The total above represents the total of those made by the HSRP in letters, issue papers, and reports to the agency. In 2018, HSRP had 24 recommendations including:
(1) Miami meeting, April 4-5:
1 issue paper - 3 recommendations;
2 updated issue papers - 7 recommendations;
1 recommendation letter - 8 recommendations;
(2) Juneau, AK meeting August 26-28:
1 recommendation letter - 5 recommendations; and
Comments on CO-OPS strategic plan - 1 recommendation and no issue papers.
Access Agency WebsiteYes
% of Recs Fully Implemented*50.00%Access Committee WebsiteYes
% of Recs Fully Implemented CommentApproximately 50% of the recommendations have been fully implemented. Of the other recommendations, some are pending, and others were directed, through NOAA, to outside agencies or organizations. The agency is not always able to implement the recommendations for a variety of organizational requirements and issues. Full implementation of many of the recommendations would require significant changes to the agency programs, budget, legislation, organization, thousands of dollars, and years to achieve. This is not always feasible, the recommendations are only able to be partially implemented or not at all. The recommendations may have longer term outcomes that are eventually partially or fully implemented.Access GSA FACA WebsiteYes
% of Recs Partially Implemented*23.00%Access PublicationsYes
% of Recs Partially Implemented CommentThere are 34 partially implemented recommendations. As noted above, the agency is not always able to partially implement the recommendations for a variety of organizational requirements and issues. Partial implementation of many of the recommendations would require significant changes to the agency programs, budget, organization, legislation, thousands of dollars, and years to achieve. This is not always feasible and the recommendations are only able to be partially implemented or may have longer term outcomes that are partially implemented.Access OtherYes
Agency Feedback*YesAccess CommentNOAA provides a public website for committee information. https://www.nauticalcharts.noaa.gov/hsrp/hsrp.htm
Agency Feedback CommentThe Panel is provided feedback from the DFO and navigation services program officials, as well as from the Decision Maker. The DFO holds feedback teleconferences with the Panel Chair to improve committee and agency interactions. In addition, the NOAA Administrator responds to Panel recommendation letters with a NOAA response letter.Narrative Description*The HSRP is legislatively mandated to provide advice to the NOAA Administrator on the responsibilities and authorities set forth in the Hydrographic Services Improvement Act (HSIA) 2002, and its Amendments, and other appropriate matters the NOAA Administrator refers to the HSRP for review and advice. The advice and recommendations of the HSRP directly supports NOAA’s hydrographic services, geospatial and positioning, and coastal resilience mission. The HSRP’s advice and recommendations is used to implement strategic improvements to NOAA’s hydrographic survey priorities; storm surge and tidal prediction models; geospatial and positioning, and coastal resilience products, services, and information. NOAA values the advice and recommendations from the HSRP and uses this information to fulfill its mission for understanding and predicting changes in the Earth’s environment and to conserve and manage coastal and marine resources to meet the Nation’s economic, social, and environmental needs.
Hide Section - COSTS

COSTS

Payments to Non-Federal Members*$31,000.00Est Payments to Non-Fed Members Next FY*$33,000.00
Payments to Federal Members*$37,500.00Est. Payments to Fed Members Next FY*$37,500.00
Payments to Federal Staff*$269,236.00Estimated Payments to Federal Staff*$269,236.00
Payments to Consultants*$0.00Est. Payments to Consultants Next FY*$0.00
Travel Reimb. For Non-Federal Members*$35,898.49Est Travel Reimb Non-Fed Members nextFY*$25,000.00
Travel Reimb. For Federal Members*$8,892.70Est Travel Reimb For Fed Members*$10,000.00
Travel Reimb. For Federal Staff*$53,792.45Est. Travel Reimb to Fed Staff Next FY*$25,000.00
Travel Reimb. For Consultants*$0.00Est Travel Reimb to Consultants Next FY*$0.00
Other Costs$150,000.00Est. Other Costs Next FY*$150,000.00
Total Costs$586,319.64Est. Total Next FY*$549,736.00
Federal Staff Support (FTE)*1.70Est. Fed Staff Support Next FY*1.70
Hide Section - MEMBERS,MEETINGS AND ADVISORY REPORTS

MEMBERS,MEETINGS AND ADVISORY REPORTS

To View all the members, meetings and advisory reports for this committee please click here
Hide Section - SUBCOMMITTEES

SUBCOMMITTEES

Committee

Subcommittees

 
ActionCommittee System IDSubcommittee NameFiscal Year
 COM-032533Arctic Priorities Working Group2019
 COM-032532Planning and Engagement Working Group2019
 COM-032534Technology Working Group2019
Hide Section - CHARTERS AND RELATED DOCS

CHARTERS AND RELATED DOCS

No Documents Found
Hide Section - DATA FROM PREVIOUS YEARS

DATA FROM PREVIOUS YEARS

Committee

Data from Previous Years

  
ActionCommittee System IDCommittee NameFiscal Year
 COM-001295Hydrographic Services Review Panel2017
 COM-002946Hydrographic Services Review Panel2016
 COM-003436Hydrographic Services Review Panel2015
 COM-005051Hydrographic Services Review Panel2014
 COM-005601Hydrographic Services Review Panel2013
 COM-007199Hydrographic Services Review Panel2012
 COM-007714Hydrographic Services Review Panel2011
 COM-009380Hydrographic Services Review Panel2010
 COM-009763Hydrographic Services Review Panel2009
 COM-011316Hydrographic Services Review Panel2008
 COM-011617Hydrographic Services Review Panel2007
 COM-013196Hydrographic Services Review Panel2006
 COM-013450Hydrographic Services Review Panel2005
 COM-015057Hydrographic Services Review Panel2004
 COM-015393Hydrographic Services Review Panel2003