Skip to main content
Content Starts Here GSA Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) Database Skip to main content

Committee Detail

Hide Section - GENERAL INFORMATION

GENERAL INFORMATION

Committee NameRoute 66 Corridor Preservation Program Advisory CouncilAgency NameDepartment of the Interior
Fiscal Year2009Committee Number25163
Original Establishment Date8/10/1999Committee StatusTerminated
Actual Termination Date9/27/2009Committee URL 
New Committee This FYNoPresidential Appointments*No
Terminated This FYYesMax Number of Members*18
Current Charter Date9/27/2007Designated Fed Officer Position Title*Route 66 Corridor Preservation Program Manager
Date Of Renewal Charter Designated Federal Officer PrefixMr.
Projected Termination Date9/26/2009Designated Federal Officer First Name*Michael
Exempt From Renewal*NoDesignated Federal Officer Middle NameRomero
Specific Termination AuthorityP.L. 106-45Designated Federal Officer Last Name*Taylor
Establishment Authority*Agency AuthorityDesignated Federal Officer Suffix
Specific Establishment Authority*Public Law 106-45Designated Federal Officer Phone*(505) 988-6742
Effective Date Of Authority*8/10/1999Designated Federal Officer Fax*505-986-5214
Committee Type*ContinuingDesignated Federal Officer Email*michael_taylor@nps.gov
Presidential*No
Committee Function*Non Scientific Program Advisory Board
Hide Section - RECOMMENDATION/JUSTIFICATIONS

RECOMMENDATION/JUSTIFICATIONS

Agency Recommendation*Terminate
Legislation to Terminate RequiredNo
Legislation Status 
How does cmte accomplish its purpose?*The purpose of the Council is to advise the Secretary of the Interior on matters relating to the Route 66 Corridor Preservation Program. The duties of the Council are solely advisory. The November 2008 meeting represented the last meeting of the advisory council which terminated when the Program sunsetted.
How is membership balanced?*The National Park Service solicited nominations for membership on the committee from the entities specified in the Act, including state historic preservation offices, tribes, Route 66 associations, and other private and public individuals interested in Route 66.
How frequent & relevant are cmte mtgs?*Estimated Number of Meetings per Year - One.
Why advice can't be obtained elsewhere?*The Route 66 Corridor Preservation Act of 1999 (Act) instructed the National Park Service to provide technical, grant-making and cost-sharing support to public and private entities that are working to preserve Route 66 resources. These resources include the highway, adjacent structures, and other sites of interest that date from Route 66’s period of outstanding historic significance (1926-1970). The Act authorizes the National Park Service to enter into cooperative agreements for the study, planning, preservation, rehabilitation and restoration of resources related to the Route 66 corridor. Additionally, the National Park Service must act as a clearinghouse for communication among entities interested in the preservation of the corridor.
Why close or partially close meetings?All meeting are open to the public.
Recommendation RemarksThe Route 66 Federal Advisory Council terminates with the sunset of the Route 66 Corridor Preservation Act on August 10, 2009.

Committee terminated August 10, 2009.
Hide Section - PERFORMANCE MEASURES

PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Outcome Improvement To Health Or Safety*NoAction Reorganize Priorities*Yes
Outcome Trust In GovernmentYesAction Reallocate ResourcesYes
Outcome Major Policy ChangesNoAction Issued New RegulationsNo
Outcome Advance In Scientific ResearchNoAction Proposed LegislationNo
Outcome Effective Grant MakingYesAction Approved Grants Or Other PaymentsNo
Outcome Improved Service DeliveryYesAction OtherNo
Outcome Increased Customer SatisfactionYesAction CommentFY 2009 - There have been four meetings since the committee was chartered in 2005. The Committee continues to review past actions and goals of the Route 66 Corriodor Preservation Program and to make recommendations for future actions and goals.
Outcome Implement Laws/Reg RequirementsYesGrants Review*Yes
Outcome OtherNoNumber Of Grants Reviewed9
Outcome CommentIn FY 2009, the committe held its last meeting. In FY 2009, this committee held its fourth meeting since it was chartered in 2005. The committee reviewed past actions and goals of the Route 66 Corriodor Preservation Program and discussed recommendations for future actions and goals.Number Of Grants Recommended3
Cost Savings*Unable to DetermineDollar Value Of Grants Recommended$67,000.00
Cost Savings CommentThe committee provides recommendations on how the NPS program can best provide customer service to the public in an efficient and cost-effective manner.Grants Review CommentNA
Number Of Recommendations*28Access Contact Designated Fed. Officer*Yes
Number Of Recommendations Commentfy 09:Highlights of the recommendations made were to: 1) complete state contexts, 2)conduct roadbed surveys, 3) complete the economic imapact study.FY 07: Highlights of the recommendations made were to: 1) have the NPS program determine the number of visitors along the Route 66 corridor in order to assess economic impacts from heritage tourism, 2) query past grant and technical assistance recipients as to quality of services provided by NPS, 3)produce a preservation education/assistance package for National Register property owners along Route 66, 4)plan and implement publicity workshop at the annual Route 66 festival, 5) recruit intern to work on web site, 6) prepare a tri-fold pamphlet for vintage motel property owners that contains information on technical and finacial assistance.Access Agency WebsiteYes
% of Recs Fully Implemented*75.00%Access Committee WebsiteNo
% of Recs Fully Implemented CommentThose recommendations adopted by the NPS program are in the process of being implemented.Access GSA FACA WebsiteYes
% of Recs Partially Implemented*25.00%Access PublicationsNo
% of Recs Partially Implemented CommentRecommendations made and adopted by the NPS program that require substantive work hours are in the process of being implemented and expect to be completed by FY09.Access OtherNo
Agency Feedback*YesAccess CommentN/A
Agency Feedback CommentPeriodic communication with the committee members as to status of recommendations adopted and being implemented.Narrative Description*The committee supports the agency's mission and strategic plan by providing recommendations on ways to best preserve and protect the most significant and representative transportation related historic resources along the Route 66 corridor between Chicago and Los Angeles.
Hide Section - COSTS

COSTS

Payments to Non-Federal Members*$0.00Est Payments to Non-Fed Members Next FY*$0.00
Payments to Federal Members*$3,600.00Est. Payments to Fed Members Next FY*$0.00
Payments to Federal Staff*$6,000.00Estimated Payments to Federal Staff*$0.00
Payments to Consultants*$0.00Est. Payments to Consultants Next FY*$0.00
Travel Reimb. For Non-Federal Members*$8,902.00Est Travel Reimb Non-Fed Members nextFY*$0.00
Travel Reimb. For Federal Members*$0.00Est Travel Reimb For Fed Members*$0.00
Travel Reimb. For Federal Staff*$5,000.00Est. Travel Reimb to Fed Staff Next FY*$0.00
Travel Reimb. For Consultants*$0.00Est Travel Reimb to Consultants Next FY*$0.00
Other Costs$0.00Est. Other Costs Next FY*$0.00
Total Costs$23,502.00Est. Total Next FY*$0.00
Federal Staff Support (FTE)*0.10Est. Fed Staff Support Next FY*0.00
Hide Section - MEMBERS,MEETINGS AND ADVISORY REPORTS

MEMBERS,MEETINGS AND ADVISORY REPORTS

To View all the members, meetings and advisory reports for this committee please click here
Hide Section - CHARTERS AND RELATED DOCS

CHARTERS AND RELATED DOCS

No Documents Found
Hide Section - DATA FROM PREVIOUS YEARS

DATA FROM PREVIOUS YEARS

Committee

Data from Previous Years

  
ActionCommittee System IDCommittee NameFiscal Year
 COM-011055Route 66 Corridor Preservation Program Advisory Council2008
 COM-011792Route 66 Corridor Preservation Program Advisory Council2007
 COM-012959Route 66 Corridor Preservation Program Advisory Council2006
 COM-013527Route 66 Corridor Preservation Program Advisory Council2005