FACACLASSIC

Note: An Annual Comprehensive Review, as required by §7 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, is conducted each year on committee data entered for the previous fiscal year (referred to as the reporting year). The data for the reporting year is not considered verified until this review is complete and the data is moved to history for an agency/department. See the Data From Previous Years section at the bottom of this page for the committee’s historical, verified data.

Details on agency responses to committee recommendations can be found under the Performance Measures section for each committee in the fields “Agency Feedback” and “Agency Feedback Comment.”

DOD - 33456 - Secretary of the Navy Advisory Panel - Agency Authority

GENERAL INFORMATION

Committee Name	Secretary of the Navy Advisory Panel	Agency Name	Department of Defense
Fiscal Year	2019	Committee Number	33456
Original Establishment Date	11/6/2007	Committee Status	Terminated
Actual Termination Date	4/1/2019	Committee URL
Actual Merged Date		Presidential Appointments*	No
New Committee This FY	No	Max Number of Members*	15
Terminated This FY	Yes	Designated Fed Officer Position Title*	DFO
Merged This FY		Designated Federal Officer Prefix
Current Charter Date	1/2/2018	Designated Federal Officer First Name*	James
Date Of Renewal Charter	1/2/2020	Designated Federal Officer Middle Name	R
Projected Termination Date		Designated Federal Officer Last Name*	Custer
Exempt From Renewal*	No	Designated Federal Officer Suffix	USN
Specific Termination Authority		Designated Federal Officer Phone*	(703) 693-3403
Establishment Authority*	Agency Authority	Designated Federal Officer Fax*
Specific Establishment Authority*	Director, Administration and Management Memorandum	Designated Federal Officer Email*	james.custer@navy.mil
Effective Date Of Authority*	10/3/2007
Exempt From EO 13875 Discretionary Cmte	Not Applicable
Committee Type*	Continuing
Presidential*	No
Committee Function*	National Policy Issue Advisory Board

RECOMMENDATION/JUSTIFICATIONS

Agency Recommendation*	Terminate
Legislation to Terminate Required	No
Legislation Status	Not Applicable
How does cmte accomplish its purpose?*	The Secretary of the Navy determined that this parent and subcommittee are not required.
How is membership balanced?*
How frequent & relevant are cmte mtgs?*
Why advice can't be obtained elsewhere?*
Why close or partially close meetings?
Recommendation Remarks	This discretionary advisory committee, the Secretary of the Navy Advisory Panel was terminated by the Department of Defense (DoD) prior to the signing of Executive Order (EO) 13875, “Evaluating and Improving the Utility of Federal Advisory Committees”, dated June 14, 2019. Notwithstanding, the DoD in accordance with EO 13875 and OMB guidance included this discretionary advisory committee as part of DoD’s 1/3 reduction in discretionary advisory committees which was directed by EO 13875. In FY-2019, the Secretary of the Navy Advisory Panel conducted only private, 1 v 1, advice via phone or seldom in person. All discussions were administrative in nature. James Custer is not able to certify as DFO as of 8-7-20.

PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Outcome Improvement To Health Or Safety*	No	Action Reorganize Priorities*	No
Outcome Trust In Government	Yes	Action Reallocate Resources	No
Outcome Major Policy Changes	Yes	Action Issued New Regulations	No
Outcome Advance In Scientific Research	No	Action Proposed Legislation	No
Outcome Effective Grant Making	No	Action Approved Grants Or Other Payments	No
Outcome Improved Service Delivery	Yes	Action Other	No
Outcome Increased Customer Satisfaction	Yes	Action Comment
Outcome Implement Laws/Reg Requirements	No	Grants Review*	No
Outcome Other	No	Number Of Grants Reviewed	0
Outcome Comment	Not Applicable	Number Of Grants Recommended	0
Cost Savings*	Unable to Determine	Dollar Value Of Grants Recommended	$0.00
Cost Savings Comment	This Advisory Panel was intended to provide expert advice to the Secretary of the Navy pertaining to his/her oversight of the Department of the Navy...an organization of over 700,000 personnel and a budget exceeding $170B per year performing continuous worldwide operations. Recommendations have typically pertained to shifts in policy, organization, resources, or capabilities. Intent is to remain ahead of forecast issues, challenges, threats, and risks. Results of recommendations have more directly resulted in affecting measures of relevance than capturing measurable cost savings.	Grants Review Comment	Not Applicable
Number Of Recommendations*	141	Access Contact Designated Fed. Officer*	Yes
Number Of Recommendations Comment	This number has been updated following a review and accounting of the SecNav Advisory Panel's 11 reports submitted to the Secretary, since 2009.	Access Agency Website	No
% of Recs Fully Implemented*	33.00%	Access Committee Website	No
% of Recs Fully Implemented Comment	47 of 141 SNAP recommendations (33%) have been fully implemented since the forming of the Advisory Panel.	Access GSA FACA Website	Yes
% of Recs Partially Implemented*	15.00%	Access Publications	Yes
% of Recs Partially Implemented Comment	21 of 141 SNAP recommendations (15%) have been fully implemented since the forming of the Advisory Panel. Combining the fully and partially implemented recommendations (47 + 21 = 68) determines that 48% of the Panel's 141 recommendations (reports spanning 2009 to 2018) have affected the leadership, management, administration, operations, or policy of the Department of the Navy.	Access Other	No
Agency Feedback*	Yes	Access Comment	N/A
Agency Feedback Comment*	Feedback must be managed with awareness to any information it conveys pertaining to national security. Feedback is certainly provided during Chair/Panel interaction with the Secretary. FACA staff recognizes feedback as resulting changes to policy, regulations, actions, resources, reorganizing, or proposed legislation.	Narrative Description*	The Secretary of the Navy Advisory Panel provided the Secretaries of the Navy and the Department of Defense with independent advice and recommendations on critical issues facing the Department of the Navy and the Navy Secretariat in the conduct of the Department's mission. These issues included, but were not limited to management, organization, acquisition reform, the shipbuilding defense industrial base, and related maritime issues.

COSTS

1. Payments to Non-Federal Members*	$0.00	1. Est Paymnts to Non-Fed Membrs Nxt FY*	$0.00
2. Payments to Federal Members*	$0.00	2. Est. Payments to Fed Members Next FY*	$0.00
3. Payments to Federal Staff*	$35,000.00	3. Estimated Payments to Federal Staff*	$0.00
4. Payments to Consultants*	$0.00	4. Est. Payments to Consultants Next FY*	$0.00
5. Travel Reimb. For Non-Federal Membrs*	$0.00	5. Est Travel Reimb Non-Fed Membr nxtFY*	$0.00
6. Travel Reimb. For Federal Members*		6. Est Travel Reimb For Fed Members*	$0.00
7. Travel Reimb. For Federal Staff*	$0.00	7. Est. Travel Reimb to Fed Staf Nxt FY*	$0.00
8. Travel Reimb. For Consultants*	$0.00	8. Est Travel Reimb to Consltnts Nxt FY*	$0.00
10. Other Costs	$0.00	10. Est. Other Costs Next FY*	$0.00
11. Total Costs	$35,000.00	11. Est. Total Next FY*	$0.00
Date Cost Last Modified		Est. Fed Staff Support Next FY*	0.00
Federal Staff Support (FTE)*	0.20	Est Cost Remarks
Cost Remarks

Interest Areas

Category Area Aviation Aviation Business Industry Computer Technology Technology Information Technology Data Data Integrity Education Education Energy Energy Fuel Fuel Transportation Natural Resources Nuclear Power Pipelines Environment Environmental Issues Oceans and Atmospheric Sciences Waste Disposal Federal Employment Compensation Federal Employees and Personnel Finance Investment Government Federal Government State Government Land Land Management and Use Legislation Regulations National Defense National Security and Defense Overseas Security Issues Research Research and Development Science and Technology Innovation Science and Technology Social Sciences History Risk Communication Social Sciences Space Space and Aeronautics Trade Exports and Imports International Commerce and Investment Water Water Use

Custom Links

Committee Level Reports