FACACLASSIC

Note: An Annual Comprehensive Review, as required by §7 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, is conducted each year on committee data entered for the previous fiscal year (referred to as the reporting year). The data for the reporting year is not considered verified until this review is complete and the data is moved to history for an agency/department. See the Data From Previous Years section at the bottom of this page for the committee’s historical, verified data.

Details on agency responses to committee recommendations can be found under the Performance Measures section for each committee in the fields “Agency Feedback” and “Agency Feedback Comment.”

DOT - 702 - Technical Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Safety Standards Committee - Statutory (Congress Created)

GENERAL INFORMATION

Committee Name	Technical Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Safety Standards Committee	Agency Name	Department of Transportation
Fiscal Year	2025	Committee Number	702
Original Establishment Date	11/30/1979	Committee Status	Chartered
Actual Termination Date		Committee URL	https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/standards-rulemaking/...
Actual Merged Date		Presidential Appointments*	No
New Committee This FY	No	Max Number of Members*	15
Terminated This FY	No	Designated Fed Officer Position Title*	Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
Merged This FY		Designated Federal Officer Prefix	Ms.
Current Charter Date	10/21/2024	Designated Federal Officer First Name*	Linda
Date Of Renewal Charter	10/21/2026	Designated Federal Officer Middle Name
Projected Termination Date		Designated Federal Officer Last Name*	Daugherty
Exempt From Renewal*	No	Designated Federal Officer Suffix
Specific Termination Authority	N/A	Designated Federal Officer Phone*	202-368-5530
Establishment Authority*	Statutory (Congress Created)	Designated Federal Officer Fax*
Specific Establishment Authority*	Section 60115 of Title 49, United States Code	Designated Federal Officer Email*	linda.daugherty@dot.gov
Effective Date Of Authority*	11/30/1979
Exempt From EO 13875 Discretionary Cmte	Not Applicable
Committee Type*	Continuing
Presidential*	No
Committee Function*	Scientific Technical Program Advisory Board

RECOMMENDATION/JUSTIFICATIONS

Agency Recommendation*	Continue
Legislation to Terminate Required	Not Applicable
Legislation Status	Not Applicable
How does cmte accomplish its purpose?*	The THLPSSC is a statutorily mandated advisory committee that advises PHMSA on proposed standards for hazardous liquid pipelines and facilities. The committee reviews each proposal to determine the technical feasibility, cost effectiveness, reasonableness, and practicability of each proposal. The committee also reviews matters relating to risk assessment. The members provide valuable technical knowledge and practical experience to supplement staff resources at relatively low cost. Since it is composed of government, industry, and public members, the committee serves as a unique forum for give and take, facilitating discussion of complex and often controversial issues. The balance of views on the Committee aids the Office of Pipeline Safety in evaluating conflicting demands placed on us by NTSB, GAO, Congress, and other external stakeholders.
How is membership balanced?*	The membership of the Committee represents a unique mix of government, industry and public members. This balance of views reflects varying interests in pipeline safety. The Committee provides a valuable, independent base of technical knowledge and practical experience.
How frequent & relevant are cmte mtgs?*	The Committee meets up to 4 times per year.
Why advice can't be obtained elsewhere?*	The Committee brings together experts with technical knowledge and practical experience who represent all constituent groups (government, industry, public) having an interest in pipeline safety. Frank and open discussion of proposed hazardous liquid pipeline safety standards by these experts is both economical and productive. The result is a stronger pipeline safety program. No other readily available source of similar expertise exists within government or industry.
Why close or partially close meetings?	N/A
Recommendation Remarks	The committee is continuing under current legislation.

PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Outcome Improvement To Health Or Safety*	Yes	Action Reorganize Priorities*	No
Outcome Trust In Government	Yes	Action Reallocate Resources	No
Outcome Major Policy Changes	Yes	Action Issued New Regulations	No
Outcome Advance In Scientific Research	Yes	Action Proposed Legislation	No
Outcome Effective Grant Making	No	Action Approved Grants Or Other Payments	No
Outcome Improved Service Delivery	Yes	Action Other	No
Outcome Increased Customer Satisfaction	Yes	Action Comment	Not Applicable
Outcome Implement Laws/Reg Requirements	Yes	Grants Review*	No
Outcome Other	No	Number Of Grants Reviewed	0
Outcome Comment	NA	Number Of Grants Recommended	0
Cost Savings*	Unable to Determine	Dollar Value Of Grants Recommended	$0.00
Cost Savings Comment	NA	Grants Review Comment	NA
Number Of Recommendations*	41	Access Contact Designated Fed. Officer*	No
Number Of Recommendations Comment	Number of recommendations count per proposed rule; therefore, the estimate would be 41 for 41 proposed rules.	Access Agency Website	Yes
% of Recs Fully Implemented*	92.00%	Access Committee Website	Yes
% of Recs Fully Implemented Comment	PHMSA uses one recommendation per rule; however, there are several recommendations within a proposed rule; therefore, the recommendations are 2 for the two proposed rules and the total number of recommendations increases to 41 (39 + 2). The January 16, 2025 meeting transcript is publicly available at the meeting webpage (https://primis-meetings.phmsa.dot.gov/meetings/8e15d35d-aa51-4d3b-b469-69cf858aa097) and at http://www.regulations.gov/ in docket number PHMSA-2024-0179.	Access GSA FACA Website	Yes
% of Recs Partially Implemented*	0.00%	Access Publications	Yes
% of Recs Partially Implemented Comment	See explanation above.	Access Other	No
Agency Feedback*	Yes	Access Comment	N/A
Agency Feedback Comment*	In general, we provide feedback during the advisory committee meeting (as captured in the transcript) and in the final rule that is issued after the advisory committee meeting. The final rule is published in the federal register. The transcript and final rule are placed in the public docket.	Narrative Description*	The committee considers each proposed pipeline safety rule to assure technical feasibility, reasonableness, cost-effectiveness and practicability of proposed standards. The members also review and evaluate each associated cost-benefit analysis and risk assessment. Meetings only occur when there is a liquid pipeline rule making that need to be reviewed. The advisory committee met one time in FY2025.

COSTS

1. Payments to Non-Federal Members*	$0.00	1. Est Paymnts to Non-Fed Membrs Nxt FY*	$0.00
2. Payments to Federal Members*	$0.00	2. Est. Payments to Fed Members Next FY*	$0.00
3. Payments to Federal Staff*	$34,000.00	3. Estimated Payments to Federal Staff*	$34,000.00
4. Payments to Consultants*	$0.00	4. Est. Payments to Consultants Next FY*	$0.00
5. Travel Reimb. For Non-Federal Membrs*	$0.00	5. Est Travel Reimb Non-Fed Membr nxtFY*	$0.00
6. Travel Reimb. For Federal Members*	$0.00	6. Est Travel Reimb For Fed Members*	$0.00
7. Travel Reimb. For Federal Staff*	$0.00	7. Est. Travel Reimb to Fed Staf Nxt FY*	$0.00
8. Travel Reimb. For Consultants*	$0.00	8. Est Travel Reimb to Consltnts Nxt FY*	$0.00
10. Other Costs		10. Est. Other Costs Next FY*
11. Total Costs	$34,000.00	11. Est. Total Next FY*	$39,000.00
Date Cost Last Modified	9/12/2025 3:16 PM	Est. Fed Staff Support Next FY*
Federal Staff Support (FTE)*	0.20	Est Cost Remarks	Other Costs Include: Facility Rent: 0.00 Contractual Services: 2,000 IT Software: 0.00 Federal Register Notice : 1,000 Printing & Reproduction: 200
Cost Remarks	Other Costs Include: Facility Rent: 0.00 Contractual Services: 687.22 IT Software: 0.00 Federal Register Notice : 453 Printing & Reproduction: 200 The committee met virtually and, therefore, there were no travel cost for Federal staff or the public and government LPAC members. Also, there was no cost for conference rooms. However, there was $1,374.45 cost for transcript service. GPAC was 1/2 the cost.

Interest Areas

Category Area Applied Science Engineering Basic Science Materials Research Business Industry Data Data Integrity Data Quality Emergency Emergency Preparedness and Management Energy Energy Fuel Transportation Pipelines Government Federal Government Internal Federal Government State Government Tribal Government Health Safety Legislation Regulations Rulemaking Science and Technology Innovation Science and Technology Social Sciences Risk Communication Trade Competitiveness Exports and Imports Water Rivers Waterways

Custom Links

Committee Level Reports