FACACLASSIC

Note: An Annual Comprehensive Review, as required by §7 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, is conducted each year on committee data entered for the previous fiscal year (referred to as the reporting year). The data for the reporting year is not considered verified until this review is complete and the data is moved to history for an agency/department. See the Data From Previous Years section at the bottom of this page for the committee’s historical, verified data.

Details on agency responses to committee recommendations can be found under the Performance Measures section for each committee in the fields “Agency Feedback” and “Agency Feedback Comment.”

NSF - 1751 - Advisory Panel for Ecological Studies - Agency Authority

GENERAL INFORMATION

Committee Name	Advisory Panel for Ecological Studies	Agency Name	National Science Foundation
Fiscal Year	2001	Committee Number	1751
Original Establishment Date	10/1/1993	Committee Status	Terminated
Actual Termination Date	6/30/2001	Committee URL
Actual Merged Date		Presidential Appointments*	No
New Committee This FY	No	Max Number of Members*	Unlimited
Terminated This FY	Yes	Designated Fed Officer Position Title*	Acting Division Director, DEB
Merged This FY		Designated Federal Officer Prefix	Dr.
Current Charter Date	6/30/1999	Designated Federal Officer First Name*	Quentin
Date Of Renewal Charter	6/30/2001	Designated Federal Officer Middle Name
Projected Termination Date		Designated Federal Officer Last Name*	Wheeler
Exempt From Renewal*	No	Designated Federal Officer Suffix
Specific Termination Authority		Designated Federal Officer Phone*	292-8480
Establishment Authority*	Agency Authority	Designated Federal Officer Fax*	(703) 292-9064
Specific Establishment Authority*	ADM IV-100	Designated Federal Officer Email*	qwheeler@nsf.gov
Effective Date Of Authority*	10/1/1993
Exempt From EO 13875 Discretionary Cmte
Committee Type*	Continuing
Presidential*	No
Committee Function*	Grant Review Committee

RECOMMENDATION/JUSTIFICATIONS

Agency Recommendation*	Continue
Legislation to Terminate Required	No
Legislation Status
How does cmte accomplish its purpose?*	Over the past year, the panel for the Ecological Studies Cluster evaluated and made funding recommendations on approximately 440 proposals. The recommendations of the panel provided critical guidance to the Cluster in making award decisions.
How is membership balanced?*	The panel consists of approximately 80 persons selected from the scientific community so as to be reasonably representative of subspeciality competence within Ecology and Ecosystem Studies. The different types and sizes of institutions having research programs in Ecology and Ecosystem Studies and representational balance by gender, race and geographical regions in the United States are also taken into consideration in panelist selection.
How frequent & relevant are cmte mtgs?*	The panel met four times in FY 01. The Cluster has two pending target dates per fiscal year for the foreseeable future. The number of proposal submissions continues to increase as funding availability remains limited. Continuation of the panels will assist the Cluster in allocating scarce resources for the support of basic ecological research.
Why advice can't be obtained elsewhere?*	The panel is a forum for frank and candid exchange among experts on the various sub-elements of ecological studies that provides crucial advice to the program officers in discharging their responsibility of supporting the proposals with the greatest potential for maintaining the health of ecology and ecosystem studies.
Why close or partially close meetings?	To review proposals that included information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals.
Recommendation Remarks

PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Outcome Improvement To Health Or Safety*		Action Reorganize Priorities*
Outcome Trust In Government		Action Reallocate Resources
Outcome Major Policy Changes		Action Issued New Regulations
Outcome Advance In Scientific Research		Action Proposed Legislation
Outcome Effective Grant Making		Action Approved Grants Or Other Payments
Outcome Improved Service Delivery		Action Other
Outcome Increased Customer Satisfaction		Action Comment
Outcome Implement Laws/Reg Requirements		Grants Review*
Outcome Other		Number Of Grants Reviewed
Outcome Comment		Number Of Grants Recommended
Cost Savings*		Dollar Value Of Grants Recommended
Cost Savings Comment		Grants Review Comment
Number Of Recommendations*		Access Contact Designated Fed. Officer*
Number Of Recommendations Comment		Access Agency Website
% of Recs Fully Implemented*		Access Committee Website
% of Recs Fully Implemented Comment		Access GSA FACA Website
% of Recs Partially Implemented*		Access Publications
% of Recs Partially Implemented Comment		Access Other
Agency Feedback*		Access Comment
Agency Feedback Comment*		Narrative Description*

COSTS

1. Payments to Non-Federal Members*	$136,600.00	1. Est Paymnts to Non-Fed Membrs Nxt FY*	$0.00
2. Payments to Federal Members*	$0.00	2. Est. Payments to Fed Members Next FY*	$0.00
3. Payments to Federal Staff*	$19,140.00	3. Estimated Payments to Federal Staff*	$0.00
4. Payments to Consultants*	$0.00	4. Est. Payments to Consultants Next FY*	$0.00
5. Travel Reimb. For Non-Federal Membrs*	$153,321.00	5. Est Travel Reimb Non-Fed Membr nxtFY*	$0.00
6. Travel Reimb. For Federal Members*	$1,946.00	6. Est Travel Reimb For Fed Members*	$0.00
7. Travel Reimb. For Federal Staff*	$0.00	7. Est. Travel Reimb to Fed Staf Nxt FY*	$0.00
8. Travel Reimb. For Consultants*	$0.00	8. Est Travel Reimb to Consltnts Nxt FY*	$0.00
10. Other Costs	$4,885.00	10. Est. Other Costs Next FY*	$0.00
11. Total Costs	$315,892.00	11. Est. Total Next FY*	$0.00
Date Cost Last Modified		Est. Fed Staff Support Next FY*	0.00
Federal Staff Support (FTE)*	0.27	Est Cost Remarks
Cost Remarks

Interest Areas

No interest areas selected for this committee.

Custom Links

Committee Level Reports